Tag: will

County scraps plans for waste-to-energy incinerator

The Board of County Commissioners broke plans Thursday for a regional waste-to-energy incinerator, preferring to haul the county’s waste to a landfill using a short-term contract instead. Commissioners Paul Smith and Billy Shreve cast the dissenting votes to maintain the job on the dining table while the county investigates its options.

“It is absolutely no charge to the county to maintain these options open,” Smith stated. “To do away with these choices is mad.”

Terminating the undertaking will not cost the county any money as the Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority, a quasi-governmental service that helps the county meet its trash disposal needs, will cover the $500,000 conclusion fee. Any remaining funds after this payment will be divided between Frederick County and Carroll County, which was once a partner in the undertaking. These funds are out of payments the authority has obtained from Wheelabrator after the service contract has been executed in 2010.

But, Young said he saw no purpose in voting to maintain plans for an incinerator, which could burn trash to electricity, open because County Executive-elect Jan Gardner intended to scrap the facility after accepting office Dec. 1.

“In the event the county executive-elect says finishing the job, what are you going to do within the next 30 to 60 days to convince her not to?” Young stated.

County Attorney John Mathias stated Gardner held the power to determine the fate of this incinerator job, not the County Council, if a decision was not made Thursday.

“I think you should terminate the entire thing,” Gardner testified in front of the plank and approximately 100 people gathered at Winchester Hall, garnering some applause.

The board unanimously voted in favor of transporting the county’s trash to an out-of-state landfill for $50.95 per ton using a highest last-minute contract.

After considering five suggestions, including three out-of-state prices and 2 waste-to-energy facilities outside Maryland, the commissioners narrowed their choices between two sidewalks with varying contracts.

Commissioners previously leaned toward the first option, which offered contracts stretching 25 years at a mean of $54.97 a ton, although that cost can escalate annually using the consumer price index and fuel rates. However, the board unanimously chose the second option, which Gardner also favored.

Around 30 individuals testified in front of the board regarding the incinerator job, using a bit more than half in favor of scrapping it along with the remainder advocating for maintaining the job on the table to consider it more deeply.

“The incinerator is a waste of energy, a waste of resources (also ) a waste of cash,” Brunswick resident Ellis Burruss testified. “It’d be good not to waste any more time .”

Other residents noted the proposed location of this incinerator, near Monocacy National Battlefield, could ruin the playground ’s beauty and tourism.

However, resident Greg Brown voiced his support for a regional incinerator, supposing it had been more environmentally friendly than the other choices commissioners were contemplating.

“The top landfills … are three or more times more pollutant than a waste-to-energy facility,” Brown stated.

Another resident stated Europe has been constructing waste-to-energy centers for many years without the unwanted effects that many have brought up.

Jim Warner, CEO of the Lancaster County Solid Waste Management Authority in Pennsylvania, pitched a proposition for hauling the county’s trash, but the commissioners chose to proceed with an undisclosed out-of-state landfill using a Brief contract.

“I was actually with this (incinerator project), but with all the energy costs and Carroll County falling out … I’m not,” Delauter said, echoing the ideas of Young and Gray.

by: http://besttopics.net/link/214519_county-scraps-plans-for-waste-to-energy-incinerator-politics-and-government-frederick-news-post

by: http://besttopics.net/link/214519_county-scraps-plans-for-waste-to-energy-incinerator-politics-and-government-frederick-news-post

Hazardous situation: Incinerators in K-P’s major hospitals from order

PESHAWAR:

Based on information gathered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 15 to 20 tons of hospital waste is made every day in the provincial capital alone. Nearly half of the total waste is recycled while the remainder is accumulated by the Peshawar Development Authority (PDA).

LRH

“To be truthful, we have one incinerator which is not in proper working condition and hardly disposes a quarter of the total waste generated,” said an official in Lady Reading Hospital while requesting anonymity. “But we have a new incinerator which will soon be functional.”

The officer, who didn’t know the specific figure of the waste created, said LRH has been one of the most popular hospitals across the nation. It has over 5,000 people (at least 3,000 in outpatient and 2,000 in accident and emergency departments) from across the province on a daily basis.

“The incinerator below process has some problems as some of its components are yet to be obtained,” said the official. “It also requires adequate gas–another significant issue –but we’re in touch with Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited (SNGPL).”

The LRH official added that the supply of gas to the hospital isn’t enough for sterilisation. He said the hospital government is connected with SNGPL authorities and the issue will soon be solved.

HMC

Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC) Chief Executive Dr Mumtaz Marwat said the incinerator in HMC is out of sequence but it will burn some waste. “The left is gathered from the PDA and the hospital administration has approved Rs0.4million for a new incinerator, which will soon be installed”

“Together with all the solid waste created by KTH, we also recycle waste that comes from some private hospitals at University Town,” said Roghani.

The EPA has already sent a written notice to the health directorate, asking it to correctly dispose of medical waste as stated beneath Hospital Waste Management Rules 2005. These say the duty of waste management is based solely with the magician that created it.

What occurs following

Actually if the incinerators at these hospitals have been repaired, the issue of unattended dump is very likely to persist. This is largely due to the tiny personal health centers which lack the fundamental knowledge and dispose of their waste as’municipal waste’. The ever-increasing amount of such centers is directly proportional to the waste created, making it a threat for the surroundings as at times that the waste is just left in a pile or buried to groundwater.

Bid to burn waste from out of City in Newhaven Incinerator

Veolia is looking to supply non-recyclable commercial and industrial waste for its Newhaven Incinerator from regions neighbouring East Sussex and Brighton and Hove.

It asserts this will permit the incinerator to create sufficient energy to power 25,000 homes always.

However, cllr Rod Main from Newhaven said this could lead to more pollution and trucks.

Veolia applied for planning permission to East Sussex County Council to raise a planning condition to permit the scheme to proceed.

General manager for Veolia in South Downs Allan Key said the firm wanted to expand the catchment area outside East Sussex and Brighton and Hove.

He explained it wouldn’t result in physical changes at the incinerator or boost to the 242,000tpa capacity. Facilities like the one we’ve got here in Newhaven recovers energy from waste that could otherwise be lost by moving out of county landfill”

Cllr Main stated:”They want more waste to assist ESCC’s carbon footprint by pumping more carbon dioxide into the air (and it’s about 100,000 tonnes pa now) to not mention how many more trucks will be coming directly across Sussex from who knows where adding to the pollution.

“It’s helping to power 25,000 homes. There is a proposed wind farm just off the shore which might power 20 times that also it will not be pumping 100,000 tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere every year for the next 20 or more years.”

“It’s helping to power 25,000 homes. There’s a proposed wind farm just off the coast which might power 20 times that and it won’t be pumping 100,000 tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere every year for the next 20 or more years.”

by: http://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/county-news/bid-to-burn-waste-from-out-of-town-in-newhaven-incinerator-1-6388465

Campaigners welcome Heathrow’s Intends to move incinerator

Heathrow Airport has announced plans to move an incinerator away from Stanwell and create a 15 mile ‘green ring’ around town.

A Labour county councillor nevertheless has stated it is like moving pieces around a chess board.

“But neighborhood resident Andrew McLuskey has done all of the hard work.

“But in saying that, we’re still fighting off to stop growth occurring at Heathrow at all.

“There are still serious reservations and I do not feel an expansion of the airport is right for the region or the whole country.

“We’re talking semantics here — it’s a big growth in a very cramped area. It’s like moving pieces around a chess board — whatever we do not like around Stanwell will be just as enormous someplace else.”

Changes to the programs include introducing a 15 mile’green corridor’ which will increase the quantity of recreational distance between town and a new car park south to the airport — which has also been reduced in size.

A brand new park and an all-weather sports pitch has been mooted for the region, as well as the potential construction of’reconciliation ponds’ to help control the release of floodwater.

Roberto Tambini, chief executive of Spelthorne Borough Council, stated:”We’re thrilled that Heathrow has listened to and acted upon our opinions in creating its upgraded expansion plans and the inhabitants of Spelthorne have been provided an improved deal for a result.

“I am certain that we are able to work together and Heathrow will continue to listen to Spelthorne residents and demonstrate a flexible way of future proposals.”

A number of those 16 billion of private money being spent will also be utilised to encourage the Environment Agency in developing flood prevention schemes to safeguard homes and land in the surrounding regions.

The airport has also announced plans to fund a new bypass to replace the present A3044 in Colnbrook and Poyle to ease congestion problems.

John Holland-Kaye, chief executive of Heathrow stated:”The growth of Heathrow can bring significant benefits for local people as well as the UK economy.

“As well as bringing 50,000 new jobs and 10,000 apprenticeships, we can also enhance the ecological landscape across the airport and also mitigate some of today’s problems including street congestion and flooding. We continue to enhance our strategies based on the feedback we get.”

The Airports Commission is currently assessing the case for growth of Heathrow or Gatwick.

“As well as bringing 50,000 new jobs and 10,000 apprenticeships, we can also improve the environmental landscape around the airport and mitigate some of today’s problems including road congestion and flooding. We continue to improve our plans based on the feedback we receive.”

The Airports Commission is currently assessing the case for expansion of either Heathrow or Gatwick.

Tinian solid waste: Where to go?

In assessing these options, the U.S. military held the assumption that the present dumpsite situated at Puntan Diablo on Tinian — the area where the Chinese team of investors is planning to develop in an integrated resort — will be closed and that a transfer station has been considered.

MARFORPAC environmental specialist Sherri Eng said the dumpsite is not something that the military will have the ability to use.

Just by looking at the requirements and the benefits of the options researched, Eng said that the simplest are the off-island disposal.”

In choosing the off-island disposal alternative, the parties might need to check in the capacity of the Marpi landfill to adapt the waste coming from Tinian — both military and civilian waste.

Eng, at a meeting with the regional regulatory agencies and officials walked them through the three systems being considered.

Choice 1: Incineration

Eng said the system that calls for the use of incinerator or waste-to-energy system requires a”properly sized incinerator,” fenced site, ash landfill, wastewater disposal, trained operators and secondary disposal site for C&D or construction and demolition waste, green waste, recyclables and white goods.

She stated that this system could cause significant waste reduction and energy production.

However, there are challenges to be met: siting and permitting, maintaining consistent operations, the demand for waste and sorting monitoring, high first cost, high maintenance cost and deadline for building.

“Construction timeline is long. It’s not something that we can install tomorrow,” said Eng.

Department of Public Works Secretary Martin C. Sablan said about the CNMI getting an incinerator that it never used owing to the difficulty of permitting through the regulatory agencies.

Choice 2: Fukuoka Landfill

The Fukuoka landfill is a fresh approach to managing solid waste. It’s a semi-aerobic landfill with a leachate gathering pipe set up in the landfill floor that drains the leachate into a treatment facility.

This method does not expect a synthetic liner.

But if that were to be chased, Tinian will need an additional 15 hectares and the use of specific structure material.

The MARFORPAC agents said they have conducted research on this method.

It had been done in Palau, Yap and American Samoa but nowhere else in the continental United States due to permitting.

“We must find some kind of waiver,” said Eng mentioning that it is not a permitted system in the U.S.

But with Fukuoka method, there is a capability to convert the existing dumpsite on Tinian.

As for leachate, the military is contemplating to upsize its waste water treatment facility to adapt this if this were the option to think about.

As the Fukuoka landfill will need clay, Eng said their study showed the deficiency of the material on Tinian; nonetheless it was indicated there’s a source in Papago.

Choice 3: Off-island Entry

This alternative proposes to use the existing Marpi landfill.

With this option, Eng stated there will be no additional land requirements.

She explained that this centralizes waste management system on Saipan.

But Eng was quick to point out that among the challenges will be how to manage the perception that Saipan becomes a dumping ground.

The military also sees the necessity to upgrade shipping infrastructure.

“We are willing to accept military waste,” said DPW Secretary Martin C. Sablan.

He explained they had excavated the floor to construct the next cell of the landfill facility.

With this option, Eng assured that”whatever we do, we’re likely to take the Tinian waste .”

Asked by DPW if the military were to foot the bill for shipping and transport of this waste, Eng stated,”We consent to discover the solution and hope to obtain the solution.” She explained she could not commit to anything.

Sablan said it’ll charge less for the military to bring their waste to Saipan but the municipality will be needing assistance.

Eng remarked that the options has to be brought down to 2.

“I do not believe we’ve got the time and money to do all three,” she explained.

Transport channel is key

As they mulled the prospective solutions to Tinian’s solid waste problems, Eng stated it is supposed that there’ll be a transfer channel.

“Transport channel is important in all these sytems,” she explained.

Closure of this dumpsite

Tinian Mayor Ramon M. Dela Cruz pointed out It Is not the responsibility of the developer to close the Present dumpsite in Puntan Diablo.

He, however, stated that Alter City has dedicated to providing around $5 million in assistance.

Asked by CIP’s Elizabeth Balajadia if they might continue to utilize the dumpsite for five more years, Tinian Mayor’s Office chief of staff Don Farrell stated”five years is too long.”

Mayor Dela Cruz stated three years would be fair.

“That will permit the developer to work on the adjacent property,” he explained.

Alter City Group is proposing to build a golf course in the present site of the dumpsite.

Alter City dedicated to help

In a hearing prior to the CNMI legislature last week, Alter City’s legal counsel Rober Torres stated,”Investor is prompted to help in its elimination.”

Mayor Dela Cruz said three years would be reasonable.

“That will allow the developer to work on the adjacent property,” he said.

Alter City Group is proposing to build a golf course at the current site of the dumpsite.

Alter City committed to assist

At a hearing before the CNMI legislature last week, Alter City’s legal counsel Rober Torres said, “Investor is motivated to assist in its removal.”
But he said the government too has to pitch in.
by: http://www.mvariety.com/special-features/business-edge/70491-tinian-solid-waste-where-to-go

Smaller cremators incinerators

Smaller cremators that will run diesel and will be capable of doing all the other dogs/cats/pets that we have. We only cremate pets individually so this is what we require.
Have your company as member of Markis Hospital waste management group as planer or supplier, contractor of solutions or operating partners of the solution of hospital waste management in the projects we are developing, starting with Larissa and Volos. Members of Markis waste management group will also have the possibility to provide training and technical services to the health sector of Greece and other countries via the TSC which we plan to make the same time in Larissa (enclosed diagram indicates the role of each party joining Markis waste management group).
● Able to burn 25-30kg per hour
● Consist of two chambers to ensure significant reduction in emission
● Be capable of temperature in range of 800c to 1000c
● Low maintenance design
● Must be Diesel fuelled
● Need more than 15amp 220- 250V power
● kW Consumption power consumption to be stated
● Onboard or in-built fuel storage storage tank & should use no more than 12L of dies el per hour to burn 25-30kg of waste
● Solid waste reduction in range of 90-97% ( should be routinely achieved)
1. –  2 medical waste autoclaves 350ltr and 100ltr
2. – 1 medical waste shredder
3. –  3 medical macerators
4. – 27 Waste transfer trolleys.

Pig corpses / stray dogs and larger animal carcasses

Pig corpses / stray dogs and larger animal carcasses –
Load capacity in the range of up to 300 kg / Burn rate approx. 50 kg per hour
Temperature Controlled Burner. Incinerators to be designed to meet the Norms of Pollution Control. Technology: Heavy-duty casing, to be a quality, rugged, reliable, economical Incinerator with relevant control, easy to operate and self-contained. Units to be pre-assembled, pre-piped, pre-wired & tested before Transport / Export
The supply will comprise the special equipment for effective medical / clinical waste management as mentioned above for a new private environment management company with operations in West and East Malaysia; Indonesia and Thailand to carry out those professional services in order to comply with the safe disposal requirements for clinical and medical waste in the region and to meet the higher technical standard in this particular field.
1.Burning rate: 250 Kg/hr. 
2.It should be able to Operate not Less than 10 hours/day
3.This incinerator must be able to destruct all combustible wastes produced by hospitals, private clinics, laboratories, institutes, etc… 
4.Design Specification: Types A, B, C, D, and E of medical waste
5.“PYROLYTIC” combustion, by controlling the gasification of waste. 
6.The incinerator must avoid the release of black smoke and fine dust, (Smokeless) during the loadings.
7.It should be able to reduce the volume of wastes by 98%.
8.It should be able to hold emission in the second burn with gas residence of not less than 2 seconds. 
The incineration should be completely free from visible smoke as well as offensive odours. 
9. The lower calorific power (L.C.P) of this waste will be 3,500 kcal/kg 
The Temperatures of combustion: Minimum will be 850oC and max 1400oC
Post combustion: >1100oC.
10. The Internal diameter of the Chimney: Ø 400mm² and its height: 8 Meter  
11. The Volume of the combustion chamber: Not Less Than 2.3 M³ 
12. Burner operation should be Automatic On/Off
13. Fuel : diesel, LPG, Natural Gas, Bio fuel
14. The supplier must provide  necessary information for the best of  the installation 

Pig corpses / stray dogs and larger animal carcasses

Pig corpses / stray dogs and larger animal carcasses –
Load capacity in the range of up to 300 kg / Burn rate approx. 50 kg per hour
Temperature Controlled Burner. Incinerators to be designed to meet the Norms of Pollution Control. Technology: Heavy-duty casing, to be a quality, rugged, reliable, economical Incinerator with relevant control, easy to operate and self-contained. Units to be pre-assembled, pre-piped, pre-wired & tested before Transport / Export
The supply will comprise the special equipment for effective medical / clinical waste management as mentioned above for a new private environment management company with operations in West and East Malaysia; Indonesia and Thailand to carry out those professional services in order to comply with the safe disposal requirements for clinical and medical waste in the region and to meet the higher technical standard in this particular field.
1.Burning rate: 250 Kg/hr. 
2.It should be able to Operate not Less than 10 hours/day
3.This incinerator must be able to destruct all combustible wastes produced by hospitals, private clinics, laboratories, institutes, etc… 
4.Design Specification: Types A, B, C, D, and E of medical waste
5.“PYROLYTIC” combustion, by controlling the gasification of waste. 
6.The incinerator must avoid the release of black smoke and fine dust, (Smokeless) during the loadings.
7.It should be able to reduce the volume of wastes by 98%.
8.It should be able to hold emission in the second burn with gas residence of not less than 2 seconds. 
The incineration should be completely free from visible smoke as well as offensive odours. 
9. The lower calorific power (L.C.P) of this waste will be 3,500 kcal/kg 
The Temperatures of combustion: Minimum will be 850oC and max 1400oC
Post combustion: >1100oC.
10. The Internal diameter of the Chimney: Ø 400mm² and its height: 8 Meter  
11. The Volume of the combustion chamber: Not Less Than 2.3 M³ 
12. Burner operation should be Automatic On/Off
13. Fuel : diesel, LPG, Natural Gas, Bio fuel
14. The supplier must provide  necessary information for the best of  the installation